Abstract:

The classification of insurgent movements as terrorist organisations remains one of the most contested issues in international law and political theory. The United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA), since its formation in 1979, has been alternately viewed as a liberation movement, an armed insurgent group, and a terrorist organisation. This research paper critically examines whether ULFA’s activities and organisational character satisfy the legal and normative criteria of “terrorism” under international law.

The study analyses United Nations perspectives, international legal instruments, state practice, and domestic responses of the Government of India, alongside perceptions of the people of Assam and North-East India. A comparative analysis with historical freedom struggles, revolutionary movements, and secessionist conflicts is undertaken to contextualise ULFA’s trajectory. The paper argues that while certain phases of ULFA’s activities align with internationally condemned terrorist conduct, the organisation cannot be assessed in a legally simplistic or monolithic manner. The paper concludes that international law favours contextual, conduct-based classification rather than blanket political labelling, and emphasizes peaceful transformation, dialogue, and constitutional engagement as lawful pathways.

Keywords:

ULFA, Terrorism, International Law, United Nations, Insurgency, Self-Determination, Assam, North-East India, Armed Movements

Aim/Objectives

Methods